Comparative Assessment of Empirical and Theoretical Mass Eruption Rate Estimation Methods Using HYSPLIT: A Case Study of Lewotobi Laki-Laki Eruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46488/Keywords:
dispersion, Simulation, Modelling, mass eruption rate, volcanic ash, eruptionAbstract
Volcanic eruptions that release fine particles into the atmosphere have a significant impact on biophysical systems and socio-economic conditions on the Earth's surface. Various eruption events have provided valuable lessons regarding appropriate mitigation strategies, both in post-eruption management and in early warning systems. The application of modeling simulations for early warnings has proven to provide great benefits by enabling more accurate predictions of volcanic ash dispersion. The Mass Eruption Rate (MER) parameter plays an important role in determining the accuracy of volcanic ash dispersion simulations, by comparing six MER estimation methods through a comparative test to identify the approach most consistent with field conditions. The comparative test with HYSPLIT software in two scenarios shows that the ash dispersion direction is consistent with Sentinel-5P and MODIS imagery. However, in the first scenario, the concentration estimates from all six MER methods deviate significantly from the validation results, whereas in the second scenario, the MER5 method produces a value that most closely approximates the CAMS EAC4 validation data. The difference between the ash concentration simulation results and the validation data can be caused by several main factors, particularly the eruption column height and the choice of Mass Eruption Rate (MER) estimation method. Variations in these two parameters have the potential to produce significant deviations in the dispersion model, thus affecting the accuracy of volcanic ash dispersion predictions.